Article
Engels’ Dialectics of—Human Activity in—Nature
Siyaveş Azeri
Pages 69-97| Published online: 27 Jan 2022
Azeri, Siyaveş. 2022. “Engels’ Dialectics of—Human Activity in—Nature.” Marxism & Sciences 1(1):69–97. https://doi.org/10.56063/MS.2201.01105.
ABSTRACT
Several Marxist theorists criticize Engels for his supposed non-dialectical and non-philosophical conceptualization of “praxis,” which, according to Lukacs, amounts to Engels’ alleged misunderstanding of Kantian “thing-in-itself.” I argue that such “criticisms” of Engels is based on a dualistic understanding of practical vs. theoretical. Contrary to the critiques’ allegations, Engels provides an account of prax-is/labour as a philosophical category that is truthful to Marx’s and his own earlier efforts for constituting a materialist dialectics—one that anticipates the concept of “human activity” elaborated particularly in philosophical works of Evald Ilyenkov and psychological studies of Lev Vygotsky. According to Engels, the so-called laws of dialectics are historical thus depending on human activity as it is “with man [that] we enter history.” Furthermore, it is through labour (the highest form of human activity) that not only the human hands but also social humanity and human consciousness have been constituted. Thus, laws of dialectics are the most general laws of human activity in social nature. Engels, truthful to Marx’s materialist method, prioritizes action over substance.
Keywords: Dialectics, praxis, activity, labour, substance.
REFERENCES
Avineri, Shlomo. 1968. The Social and Political Thought of Karl Marx. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Azeri, Siyaveş. 2013. “Conceptual Cognitive Organs: Toward an Historical-Materialist Theory of scientific Knowledge.” Philosophia: Philosophical Quarterly of Israel 41(4): 1095–1123.
———. 2016. “Value and Production of Knowledge: How Science is Subsumed to Capital.” Critique: Journal of Socialit Theory 44(1–2): 103–128.
———. 2017. “Class Politics as the Unity of Theory and Practice and the Criticism of Epistemology.” Revista Theomai 35(1): 72–85.
———. 2019. “Activity, Labour, and Praxis: An Outline for a Critique of Epistemology.” Critique: Journal of Socialist Theory 47(4): 585–602.
———. 2020. “Evald Ilyenkov’s Marxian Critique of Epistemology and Education.” Science & Society 84(3): 342–368.
———. 2021. “The Match of ‘Ideals’: The Historical Necessity of the Interconnection Between Mathematics and Physical Sciences.” Social Epistemology 35(1): 20–36.
Engels, Frederick. 1975. “Dialectics of Nature.” In Marx and Engels Collected Works, Vol. 27. 311–588. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
———. 1988. “On Authority.” In Marx and Engels Collected Works, Vol. 23. 422–425. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
———. 1990. “Ludwig Feuerbach and the End of German Classical Philosophy.” In Marx and Engels Collected Works, Vol. 26. 355–398. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
Ilyenkov, Evald V. 1974. “Activity and Knowledge.” Marxists Internet Archive. Translated by Peter Moxhay, transcribed by Nate Schmolze.
https://www.marxists.org/archive/ilyenkov/works/activity/index.html
———. 2007. “A Contribution on the Question of the Concept of “Activity” and Its Significance for Pedagogy.” Journal of Russian and East European Psychology 45(4): 69–74.
———. 2017. “Cosmology of Spirit.” Stasis 5(2): 164–190.
Ilyenkov, Evald V., and Valentin Korovikov. 1954. “Theses on the Question of the Interconnection of Philosophy and Knowledge of Nature and Society in the Process of their Historical Development.” Marxists Internet Archive. Translated by David Bakhurst, transcribed by Andy Blunden.https://www.marxists.org/archive/ilyenkov/works/articles/Theses.pdf
Kangal, Kaan 2020. Friedrich Engels and the Dialectics of Nature. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34335-4
Kolakowski, Leszek. 1978. Main Currents of Marxism. Translated by P. S. Falla. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lichtheim, George. 1961. Marxism. New York: Frederick A. Praeger.
Lukacs, Georg. 1971. History and Class Consciousness. Translated by R. Livingstone. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Maidansky, Andrey. 2016. “Reality as Activity: The Concept of Praxis in Soviet Philosophy.” In The Practical Essence of Man: The ‘Activity Approach’ in Late Soviet Philosophy, edited by A. Maidansky & V. Oittinen, 42–57. Leiden & Boston: Brill.
Marx, Karl. 1975. “Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844.” In Marx and Engels Collected Works, Vol. 3. 229–346. Moscow: Progress Publishers,
———. 1992. Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, Vol. 1. Translated by B. Fowkes. New York: Penguin Books.
Marx, Karl, and Frederick Engels. 1976a. “Manifesto of the Communist Party.” In Marx and Engels Collected Works, Vol. 6. 477–519. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
———. 1976b. “The German Ideology.” In Marx Engels Collected Works (MECW) Vol. 5, 19–452. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
Murray, Patrick. 1988. Marx’s Theory of Scientific Knowledge. Atlantic Highlands: Humanities Press International.
Oittinen, Vesa. 2016. “Praxis’ as the Criterion of Truth? The Aporias of Soviet Marxism and the Activity Approach.” In The Practical Essence of Man: The ‘Activity Approach’ in Late Soviet Philosophy, edited by A. Maidansky and V. Oittinen, 29–41. Leiden & Boston: Brill.
Piedra Arencibia, Rogney. 2021. “Ilyenkov’s Dialectics of the Ideal and Engels’ Dialectics of Nature.” Historical Materialism (published online ahead of print 2021). https://doi.org/10.1163/1569206X-12342048
Rees, John. 1994. “Engels’ Marxism.” Marxists Internet Archive. https://www.marxists.org/history/etol/writers/rees-j/1994/xx/engels.html
Schmidt, Alfred. 1971. The Concept of Nature in Marx. Translated by B. Fowkes. London: NLB.
Vygotsky, L. S. 1997a. “Consciousness as a Problem for the Psychology of Behavior.” In The Collected Works of L. S. Vygotsky Vol. 3. translated by R. Van Der Veer, 63–79. New York: Springer.
———. 1997b. The Historical Meaning of the Crisis in Psychology: A Methodological Investigation. In The Collected Works of L. S. Vygotsky Vol. 3. translated by R. Van Der Veer, 233–343. New York: Springer.