Origin of Engels’ The Origin: A Reappraisal in the Light of The Ethnological Notebooks of Marx
Pages 99-130| Published online: 27 Jan 2022
Yaman, Melda. 2022. “Origin of Engels’ The Origin: A Reappraisal in the Light of The Ethnological Notebooks of Marx .” Marxism & Sciences 1(1):99–130. https://doi.org/10.56063/MS.2201.01106.
Engels had based his The Origin of the Family, Private Property, and the State on Marx’s ethnological notebooks. In this paper, I want to place the roots of Engels’ book in Marx’s notes and reveal the various contributions of Marx to it. Marx’s notebooks provided both the motivation and the initial source material, and Engels’ life-long cooperation with him also contributed to this work. However, there are some significant divergences between Engels’ work and that of Marx. I will focus only on the differences related to the rise of the patriarchal family. Marx’s notebooks on ethnology are published under the title The Ethnological Notebooks of Karl Marx. Since it is much less known compared to Engels’ book, I also would like to highlight it in the paper.
Keywords: Engels, Marx, ethnological notebooks, patriarchy, socialist feminism.
Aaby, Peter. 1977. “Engels and Women.” Critique of Anthropology 3(9–10): 25–53.
Anderson, Kevin. 1998. “Uncovering Marx’s Yet Unpublished Writings.” Critique 30(3): 179–187.
Anderson, Kevin. 2002. “Marx’s Late Writings on Non-Western and Precapitalist Societies and Gender.” Rethinking Marxism 14(4): 84–96.
Arruzza, Cinzia. 2013. Dangerous Liasions: The Marriages and Divorces of Marxism and Feminism. Wales: Merlin Press.
Beneria, Lourdes and Gita Sen. 1981. “Accumulation, Reproduction, and Women’s Role in Economic Development: Boserup Revisited.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 7(2): 279–298.
Bernstein, Edward. 1921. My Years of Exile: Reminiscences of a Socialist. Translated by Bernard Miall, London: L. Parsons.
Blackledge, Paul. 2018. “Frederick Engels, Social Reproduction, and the Problem of a Unitary Theory of Women’s Oppression.” Social Theory and Practice 44(3): 297–321.
Burris, Val. 1982. “The Dialectic of Women’s Oppression: Notes on the Relation between Capitalism and Patriarchy.” Berkeley Journal of Sociology 27: 51–74.
Carver, Terrel and Daniel Blank. 2014. A Political History of the Editions of Marx and Engels’s “German Ideology Manuscripts.” New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Chattopadhyay, Paresh. 1999. “Women’s Labor under Capitalism and Marx. Capital Accumulation and Women’s Labor in Asian Economies by Peter Custers.” Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars 31(4): 67–77.
Cohen, Jack et al. 2010a. “Preface.” In Marx and Engels Collected Works, Vol: 5. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
———. 2010b. “Preface.” In Marx and Engels Collected Works, Vol: 26. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
———. 2010c. “Preface.” In Marx and Engels Collected Works, Vol: 47. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
Diamond, Stanley. “The Marxist Tradition as a Dialectical Anthropology.” Dialectical Anthropology 1: 1–5.
Dunayevskaya, Raya. 1991. Rosa Luxemburg, Women’s Liberation, and Marx’s Philosophy of Revolution, 2nd edition. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
Eisenstein, Zillah. 1979. “Developing a Theory of Capitalist Patriarchy and Socialist Feminism.” In Capitalist Patriarchy and the Case For Socialist Feminism, edited by Zillah Eisenstein, 5–41. London: Monthly Review Press.
———. 1990. “Constructing a Theory of Capitalist Patriarchy and Socialist Feminism.” In Women, Class, and the Feminist Imagination: A Socialist-Feminist Reader, edited by Karen V. Hansen and Ilene J. Philipson. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Engels, Friedrich. 2010a. “The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State.” In Marx and Engels Collected Works, Vol. 26, 129–277. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
———. 2010b. “Preface to the Fourth German Edition of The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State (1891).” In Marx and Engels Collected Works, Vol. 27. 203–215. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
Fluehr-Lobban, Carolyn. 1979. “A Marxist Reappraisal of the Matriarchate.” Current Anthropology 20(2): 341–359.
Foster, J. Bellamy, Brett Clark and Hannah Holleman. 2020. “Marx and the Indigenous.” Monthly Review, Commentary 71(9): 1–19, https://monthlyreview.org/2020/02/01/marx-and-the-indigenous/.
Gough, Kathleen. 1971. “The Origin of the Family.” Journal of Marriage and Family 33(4): 760–771.
Gimenez, Martha. 2009. “Marxist and non-Marxist Elements in Engels’ Views on the Oppression of Women.” In Engels Revisited, edited by Jane Sayers et al., 37–57. New York: Routledge.
Hartmann, Heidi. 1981. “The Unhappy Marriage of Marxism and Feminism: Towards a more progressive union.” In The Unhappy Marriage of Marxism and Feminism: A Debate of Class and Patriarchy, edited by Lydia Sargent, 1–43. Montréal: Pluto Press.
Haug, Frigga. 1977. “Problematical Aspects of Engels’ View of the Woman Question.” Science & Society 62(1): 106–111.
———. 2015. “Gender Relations.” In Marxism and Feminism, edited by Shahrzad Mojab, 33–-76. London: Zed, 2015.
Himmelweit, Susan and Simon Mohun. 1977. “Domestic Labour and Capital.” Cambridge Journal of Economics, 1: 17–18.
Humphries, Jane. 2009. “The Origin of the Family: Born out of Scarcity Not Wealth.” In Engels Revisited, edited by Jane Sayers et al., 11–37. New York: Routledge.
Jackson, Stevi. 1999. “Marxism and Feminism.” In Marxism and Social Science, edited by Andrew Gamble, David Marsh and Tony Tant, 11–35. London: MacMillan Press.
Kelley, Donald R. 1984. “The Science of Anthropology: An Essay on the Very Old Marx.” Journal of the History of Ideas 4(2): 245–262.
Knight, Chris. 2018. “Early Human Kinship Was Matrilineal.” In Early Human Kinship: From Sex to Social Reproduction, edited by Nicholas J. Allen, Hilary Callan, Robin Dunbar and Wendy James, 61–83. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Krader, Lawrence. 1973a. “The Works of Marx and Engels In Ethnology Compared.” International Review of Social History 18: 220–248.
———. 1973b. “Karl Marx As Ethnologist.” Transactions New York Academy of Sciences II. Serial 35: 304–313.
———. 1974. “Introduction.” In The Ethnological Notebooks of Karl Marx, transcribed and edited by Lawrence Krader, 2nd edition, 1–86. Amsterdam: Internationaal Instituut Voor Sociale Geschiedenis.
Leacock, Eleanor B. 1974. “Introduction.” In Frederick Engels, The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State, 7–67. New York: International Publishers.
———. 1978. “Women’s Status in Egalitarian Society: Implications for Social Evolution.” Current Anthropology 19(2): 247–275.
Levine, Norman. 1973. “Anthropology in the Thought of Marx and Engels.” Studies in Comparative Communism 6(1–2): 7–26.
Luxton, Meg. 2006. “Feminist Political Economy in Canada and the Politics of Social Reproduction.” Social Reproduction: Feminist Political Economy Challenges Neo-liberalism, edited by Kate Bezanson and Meg Luxton, 11–45. London: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
Maconachie, Moira. 2009. “Engels, Sexual Divisions, and the Family.” In Engels Revisited, edited by Jane Sayers et al., 98–113. New York: Routledge.
Marx, Karl. 1974. The Ethnological Notebooks of Karl Marx. Transcribed and edited by Lawrence Krader, Amsterdam: Internationaal Instituut Voor Sociale Geschiedenis, 2nd edition.
———. 2010a. “Capital Volume I.” In Marx and Engels Collected Works, Vol. 35. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
———. 2010b. “Economic Manuscripts of 1857-58.” In Marx and Engels Collected Works, Vol. 28. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
Marx, Karl and Friedrich Engels. 2010a. “Holy Family.” In Marx and Engels Collected Works, Vol. 4. 5–212. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
———. 2010b. “German Ideology.” In Marx and Engels Collected Works, Vol. 5. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
———. 2010c. “Manifesto of the Communist Party.” In Marx and Engels Collected Works, Vol. 6. 477–520. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
———. 2010d. Marx and Engels Collected Works, Vol. 43. 184–185. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
———. 2010e. Marx and Engels Collected Works, Vol: 46. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
———. 2010f. Marx and Engels Collected Works, Vol. 47. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
———. 2010g. Marx and Engels Collected Works, Vol. 49. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
Mitchell, Juliet. 1990. “Women: The Longest Revolution.” In Women, Class, and the Feminist Imagination: A Socialist-Feminist Reader, edited by Karen V. Hansen and Ilene J. Philipson, 43–74. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
N., D. and K., G. 1989. “Sexual Division of Labour.” Economic and Political Weekly 24(34): 1949–1950.
Patterson, Thomas C. 1989. Karl Marx, Anthropologist. New York: Oxford International Publishers.
Rosemont, Franklin. 2005. “Karl Marx and the Iroquois.” In Arsenal: Surrealist Subversion 4 edited by Franklin Rosemond. Chicago: Black Swan Press.
Rubel, Maximillian 2005. “The Emancipation of Women in the Works of Marx and Engels.” In Political and Historical Encyclopedia of Women, edited by Christine Fauré, 335–356. London: Taylor and Francis.
Sacks, Karen. 1983. “Appendix Three–Engels Revisited: Women, the Organizatıon of Production, and Private Property.” Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 3(4): 385–401.
Scott, John. W. 2005. “Kadın İşçi.” In Kadınların Tarihi, edited by Geneviéve Fraisse and Michelle Perrot, translated by Ahmet Fethi, V. Cilt, 374–398. İstanbul: İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları.
Smith, David N. 2002. “Accumulation and the Clash of Cultures: Marx’s Ethnology in Context.” Rethinking Marxism 14(4): 73–83.
Stern, Bernhard J. 1948. “Engels on the Family.” Science & Society 12(1): 42–64.
Trat, Josette. 1998. “Engels and the Emancipation of Women.” Science & Society 62(1): 88–105.
Thompson, Edward P. 1981. “The Poverty of Theory or An Orrery of Errors.” In The Poverty of Theory & Other Essays, 4th edition. London: Merlin.
Vogel, Lise. 2013. Marxism and the Oppression of Women: Toward a Unitary Theory. Boston: BRILL, Historical Materialism Book Series.
Walby, Slyvia. 1989. “Theorizing Patriarchy.” Sociology 23(2): 213–234.
Ward Gailey, Christine. 2003. “Community, State and Questions of Social Evolution in Marx’s ‘Ethnological Notebooks’.” Anthropologica 45(1): 45–57.
Weikart, Richard. 1994. “Marx, Engels, and the Abolition of the Family.” History of European Ideas 18(5): 651–672.