Production Beyond Instrumentality: Marx’s Capital and Ilyenkov’s Methodological Explanation
Pages 137-155| Published online: 03 Feb 2023
Folinas, Nikolaos. 2023. “Production Beyond Instrumentality: Marx’s Capital and Ilyenkov’s Methodological Explanations.” Marxism & Sciences 2(1): 137–155.
The work of Evald Ilyenkov, in addition to its importance for the deep understanding of Marxist developments in the former USSR, is distinguished by a variety of topics that the philosopher dealt with (indicatively I refer to German Idealism, the methodology of Capital and the Grundrisse, questions of education and psychology, but also more current issues such as cybernetics). In this article I will elaborate on the category of the ideal and how this category can be exploited in the Marxian analyses of the first volume of Capital; more specifically in the third and fourth sections, that is, in the production of absolute and relative surplus value. Starting from the interpretation that Habermas gives in these parts of Marx’s Capital, that is to say a logic of instrumentality that attributes to Marx, I will follow Ilyenkov’s analysis of the ideal, as carried out by Ilyenkov in the essay on the Dialectics of the Ideal. Even though Ilyenkov does not follow the analysis of the ideal in the production process, I will show in the third part that this category can be used in these Marxian analyses. The position of this article is that the category of the ideal also concerns production and hence Marx’s analysis goes beyond instrumentality. Looking back at the analyses of the labor process (absolute surplus value) and cooperation (relative surplus value) one can find the position of the ideal as fundamental in the explanation of the materiality of production and the consciousness that results from this materiality. The aim is to show that the elaboration of the category of the ideal, as carried out by Ilyenkov in the essay on the Dialectics of the Ideal, can help to explain more comprehensively, parts of the Marxian analysis that even Ilyenkov have not paid attention to the same extent as the first chapters of the first volume of Capital. So, this paper concerns the possibility of processing categories of materiality (labor process and cooperation) with the mediation of a category, which is basically used to explain problems formally (that is, of circulation) as is ideal, with the content given to it by Ilyenkov. In the article follows Ilyenkov’s critique of positivism and its characteristics and closes with the analyses of the concrete and the abstract, which characterizes the category of the ideal.
KEYWORDS: Ideal, materialism, positivism, instrumentality, production process, labor process, cooperation.
Azeri, Siyaveş. 2020. “Evald Ilyenkov’s Marxian Critique of Epistemology and Education.” Science and Society 84(3): 342–368.
———. 2022. “Engels’ Dialectics of—Human Activity—in Nature.” Marxism & Sciences 1(1): 69–97.
Bakhurst, David. 1991. Consciousness and Revolution in Soviet Philosophy: From the Bolsheviks to Evald Ilyenkov. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
———. 1995. “Lessons from Ilyenkov.” The Communication Review 12: 155–178.
Dubrovsky, David. 1971. Mental Phenomena and the Brain. Moscow: Nauka.
———. 1988. The Problem of the Ideal: The Nature of Mind and its Relationship to the Brain and Social Medium. Translated by Vladimir Stankevich. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
Engels, Friedrich. 1969 . Ludwig Feuerbach and the End of Classical German Philosophy. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
Flood, Tony. 1977/1978. “Jurgen Habermas’s Critique of Marxism”. Science & Society 41(4): 448–464.
Habermas, J. 1972. Knowledge and Human Interests. Translated by Jeremy Shapiro. Boston: Beacon Press.
Harvey, David. 2010. A Companion to Marx’s Capital. London: Verso.
Ilyenkov, Evald. 1982. The Dialectics of the Abstract and the Concrete in Marx’s Capital. Translated by Sergei Kuzyakov. London: Progress Publishers.
———. 2009. “The Ideal in Human Activity.” Marxist Internet Archive, preface by Mike Cole. https://www.marxists.org/admin/books/activity theory/ilyenkov/ideal-activity.pdf
———. 2012. “Dialectics of the Ideal.” Historical Materialism 20(2): 149–193.
Jones, Peter. 2000. “The Dialectics of the Ideal and Symbolic Mediation.” In Evald Ilyenkov’s Philosophy Revisited, edited by Vesa Oitinen. 205–229. Helsinki: Kikimora Publications.
Levant, Alex. 2012. “E.V. Ilyenkov and Creative Soviet Theory: An Introduction to ‘Dialectics of the Ideal’.” Historical Materialism 20(2): 125–148.
———. 2014. “Emancipating Open Marxism: E. V. Ilyenkov’s Post-Cartesian Anti-Dualism.” In Dialectics of the Ideal, Evald Ilyenkov and Creative Soviet Marxism, edited by Alex Levant & Vesa Oittinen. 183–203. Leiden: Brill.
Maidansky, Andrey. 2005. “Metamorphoses of the ideal.” Studies in East European thought 57: 289–304.
———. 2014. “Reality of the Ideal.” In Dialectics of the Ideal, Evald Ilyenkov and Creative Soviet Marxism, edited by Alex Levant & Vesa Oittinen. 123–142. Leiden: Brill.
Mareev, Sergei. 2016. “Lifsits and Ilyenkov on the nature of the Ideal.” Studies in East European Thought 68: 319–329.s
Marx, Karl. 1976 . Capital Volume 1. Translated by Ben Fowkes. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
Marx, Karl and Friedrich Engels. 1962. Marx Engels Werke. Berlin: Dietz Verlag.
McBride, William. 2000. “Habermas and the Marxian Tradition”. In Perspectives on Habermas, edited by Lewis Edwin Hahn. 425-444. Illinois: Open Court.
Myuoskovic, Ben. 1974. “Marx and Engels on Idealism and Materialism.” Journal of Thought 9(3): 157–168.
Oittinen, Vesa. 2005. “Evald Ilyenkov as Interpreter of Spinoza,” Studies in East European Thought 57: 319 – 338.
———. 2014. “Evald Ilyenkov, the Soviet Spinozist.” In Dialectics of the Ideal, Evald Ilyenkov and Creative Soviet Marxism, edited by Alex Levant & Vesa Oittinen. 107–121. Leiden: Brill.
Oittinen, Vesa and Paula Rauhala. 2014. “Evald Ilyenkov’s Dialectics of Abstract and Concrete and the Recent Value-Form Debate.” In Dialectics of the Ideal, Evald Ilyenkov and Creative Soviet Marxism, edited by Alex Levant & Vesa Oittinen. 165–181. Leiden: Brill.
Tarrit, Fabien. 2006. “A Brief History, Scope and Peculiarities of “Analytical Marxism.” Review of Radical Political Economy 38(4): 595–618.