ESSAY
Marx, Engels and the Communist Revolution Between Determinism, Telos and Self-Emancipation
Joshua Graf
Pages 145–167| Published online: 03 February 2025
Graf, Joshua. 2025. “Marx, Engels and the Communist Revolution Between Determin-ism, Telos and Self-Emancipation.” Marxism & Sciences 4(1): 145–167.
https://doi.org/10.56063/MS.2301.04101
ABSTRACT
It seems that history has tricked the communist movement. It has cast into doubt the certainty of a revolutionary outbreak and victory in the most devel-oped capitalist countries. Former tsaristic Russia had a successful revolution, but shortly after became a highly bureaucratized state–in many respects not very different from other modern state apparatus. This has caused much confusion about the value of the notion of revolution in Marx and Engels. Therefore, this essay attempts to rediscuss the ideas of Marx and Engels in terms of the com-munist revolution. Ii is argued that they insisted upon a consequent internation-alist approach, with the aim of self-emancipation of the working class, and did not approve proxy politics. Furthermore, they backed down from any sacral doc-trine, and persist on the necessity of concrete analysis of concrete situations to come to the most promising strategy. This shows that they were not just thinking abstractly about revolution – and that their method is useful also in revolutionarily unfavorable conditions.
KEYWORDS: Marxism, Revolution, Marx, Engels.
REFERENCES
Achcar, Gilbert. 2013. Marxism, Orientalism, Cosmopolitanism. London: Saqi.
Au, Wayne. 2018. A Marxist Education: Learning to Change the World. Chicago: Hay-market Books,
Basso, Luca. 2016. Marx And the Common. From Capital to Late Writings. Chicago: Haymarket books.
Benjamin, Walter. 2010. Über den Begriff der Geschichte: Werke und Nachlaß kritische Gesamtausgabe Band 19. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
Bohlender, Matthias. 2019. “Zwischen Wahrheitspolitik und Wahrheitsmanifestation. Zur Genealogie des ‚Kommunistischen Manifests. ” In Foucault und das Politi-sche, edited by Oliver Marchart et al. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Bohlender, Matthias, Anna-Sophie-Schönfelder and Matthias Spekker. 2020. Wahrheit und Revolution: Studien zur Grundproblematik der Marx`schen Gesellschaftskri-tik. Bielefeldt: Transcript.
Deppe, Frank. 1970. Verschwörung, Aufstand und Revolution. Blanqui und das Problem der sozialen Revolution. Frankfurt am Main: Europäische Verlagsanstalt.
Dillmann, Renate. 2022. China. Ein Lehrstück. Berlin: Die Buchmacherei.
Draper, Hal. 2001. Socialism From Below. Center for Socialist History: Alameda
______. 1990. Karl Marx Theory of Revolution, Volume IV Critique of Other Socialisms. New York: Monthly Review Press.
______. 1986. Karl Marx`s Theory on Revolution, Volume III – The Dictatorship of The Proletariat. Monthly Review Press: New York.
Fisher, Mark. 2013. Kapitalistischer Realismus ohne Alternative? Hamburg: VSA.
Güner, Gülser. 2023. Über die Verhältnisse zwischen der Führung der deutschen Arbei-terbewegung und Marx/Engels (1847–1852) Verschmelzung und Harmonie oder Kontroversen und Bruch? Berlin: Humboldt-Universität.
Lindner, Kolja. 2010. “Marx’s Eurocentrism. Postcolonial studies and Marx scholarship.” Radical Philosophy 161: 27–41.
Luxemburg, Rosa. 1919. Gesammelte Werke: Band 4. Dietz; Berlin.
Marx, Karl and Frederick Engels. 2010. Marx Engels Collected Works [e-version]. (MECW). London: Lawrence & Wishart.
______. 1966. Marx-Engels-Werke [e-version] (MEW). Berlin: Dietz.
Mau, Søren. 2021. Stummer Zwang. Eine marxistische Analyse der ökonomischen Macht im Kapitalismus. Berlin: Dietz.
Meyer, Ahlrich. 1977. Frühsozialismus. Theorien der sozialen Bewegung 1789–1848. Freiburg/München: Verlag Karl Alber.
Pradella, Lucia 2017. “Postcolonial Theory and the Making of the world Working Class.” Critical sociology 43: 573–586.
Riexinger, Bernd. 2018. Verbindende Klassenpolitik. Hamburg: VSA.
Saito, Kohei. 2024. Slow Down: How Degrowth Communism Can Save The Earth. Lon-don: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
Schieder, Wolfgang. 2018. Karl Marx: Politik in eigener Sache. Darmstadt: Theiss.